From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006958.html | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 131 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006958.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006958.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006958.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006958.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..395689913 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006958.html @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Finalizing update process + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Finalizing update process

+ Michael Scherer + misc at zarb.org +
+ Fri Jul 22 11:27:56 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
Le vendredi 22 juillet 2011 à 11:04 +0300, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
+> On 19 June 2011 15:00, Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org> wrote:
+> > Le samedi 18 juin 2011 à 23:25 +0300, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
+> >> On 15 June 2011 22:32, Stew Benedict <stewbintn at gmail.com> wrote:
+> >
+> >> qa-bugs@ can't be be set as the assignee in bug reports, it should be
+> >> made possible.
+> >
+> > Yes, that requires to create a account for that. Dmorgan knows, I
+> > don't :/ ( and we should document that once the wiki will be installed
+> > ).
+> >
+> >> The same for sec team, there should be a way to assign/put-in-CC.
+> > That would requires the creation of the secteam as something more formal
+> > than now, and for now, that's "no".
+> > So you should better explain the need about assigning or put a group of
+> > people in CC when you can simply put one person for that.
+> >
+> >
+> > --
+> > Michael Scherer
+> >
+> >
+> 
+> Sorry, I seem to have missed this email.
+> 
+> I can see security at groups.mageia.org can be set as bug assignee in
+> bugzilla now, so the discussion is null at this point.
+> 
+> About the "better explanation", the benefits of having one generic
+> email address set as assignee in security-related bug reports, just
+> one point, not having one point of failure, if the only person in the
+> sec team becomes unavailable for a prolonged period of time for any
+> reason, someone will have to trudge through the bug reports assigned
+> to him to change the assignee field, whereas if a generic email
+> address is used that won't be necessary.
+
+If the only problem is to reassign bugs, then we can write a script. 
+
+My main worries are that given that right now, there is 1 single person
+in the group, that change nothing. I would even add that it proves my
+point, using alias mean that people do not know who they assign the bugs
+to.
+
+So while you think there is no point of failure, but there is, and you
+do not see nor know it.
+
+Also, assigning thing to a group of people tend to make them think
+"someone else will do it" :/
+
+Finally, if the problem is "someone can leave and we have to reassign
+bug", there is nothing special regarding security bugs to that regard,
+and we have the need to reassign others bugs too, and yet, we do not use
+aliases. So why make a exception just for that ?
+-- 
+Michael Scherer
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1