From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006836.html | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006836.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006836.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006836.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006836.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..bbf90917e --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006836.html @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Adobe Flash player 11 Beta 1 in Cauldron + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Adobe Flash player 11 Beta 1 in Cauldron

+ Florian Hubold + doktor5000 at arcor.de +
+ Sun Jul 17 21:46:12 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
Am 16.07.2011 11:11, schrieb Anssi Hannula:
+> On 15.07.2011 11:10, Ahmad Samir wrote:
+>> Hello.
+>>
+>> As you've seen the thread, posted by Charles A Edwards, there's a new
+>> version of flash which has native 64bit support, it's still in beta
+>> but seems to work well, some questions:
+>> - Any objections about offering it in mga1? on x86_64 only and keeping
+>> the 32bit stable one as is for now; not having to install
+>> nspluginwrapper or a 32bit browser on a 64bit system is an
+>> improvement, IMHO.
+>>
+>> - For Cauldron:
+>>    o Do we ship the 11 beta1 for both arch?
+>>    o Just x86_64 and keep the 32bit stable flash for now
+>>    o Keep the 32bit stable and create another spec (Name:
+>> flash-player-pluing11) for 11 beta1? this way 32bit users will have a
+>> choice to install the version they want.
+>>
+>> WDYT?
+> I'd provide it as 'flash-player-plugin11' or 'flash-player-plugin-beta'
+> for both cauldron and mga1.
+>
++1
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1