From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006710.html | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006710.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006710.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006710.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006710.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a8feb2999 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006710.html @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Adobe Flash player 11 Beta 1 in Cauldron + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Adobe Flash player 11 Beta 1 in Cauldron

+ Anssi Hannula + anssi.hannula at iki.fi +
+ Sat Jul 16 11:11:24 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
On 15.07.2011 11:10, Ahmad Samir wrote:
+> Hello.
+> 
+> As you've seen the thread, posted by Charles A Edwards, there's a new
+> version of flash which has native 64bit support, it's still in beta
+> but seems to work well, some questions:
+> - Any objections about offering it in mga1? on x86_64 only and keeping
+> the 32bit stable one as is for now; not having to install
+> nspluginwrapper or a 32bit browser on a 64bit system is an
+> improvement, IMHO.
+> 
+> - For Cauldron:
+>   o Do we ship the 11 beta1 for both arch?
+>   o Just x86_64 and keep the 32bit stable flash for now
+>   o Keep the 32bit stable and create another spec (Name:
+> flash-player-pluing11) for 11 beta1? this way 32bit users will have a
+> choice to install the version they want.
+> 
+> WDYT?
+
+I'd provide it as 'flash-player-plugin11' or 'flash-player-plugin-beta'
+for both cauldron and mga1.
+
+-- 
+Anssi Hannula
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1