From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006591.html | 190 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 190 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006591.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006591.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006591.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006591.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..dc843023d --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006591.html @@ -0,0 +1,190 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Generic 64-bit building question + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Generic 64-bit building question

+ Sander Lepik + sander.lepik at eesti.ee +
+ Wed Jul 13 11:25:00 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
13.07.2011 12:17, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU kirjutas:
+>
+> Indeed, libmagick-devel, libwmf-devel, libchm-devel, libpoppler-qt4-devel, etc. do expand/match/find_provides correctly on 64-bit too!
+>
+> But then *why* some names have to be written as:
+> qt4-devel and *not* libqt4-devel
+> python-devel and *not* libpython-devel
+> ?
+> Isn't this an inconsistency?
+That's why there was discussion started, some time ago, in this list, to 
+create devel packages so that they will provide %{name}-devel and 
+lib%{name}-deve.
+
+http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.mageia.devel/6365
+> Moreover, excuse me, but I find it stupid to have a 64-bit lib called `libksane-devel`.
+This is devel package, not library itself, so it's OK.
+
+--
+Sander
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1