From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006589.html | 196 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 196 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006589.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006589.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006589.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006589.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..010020331 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006589.html @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Generic 64-bit building question + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Generic 64-bit building question

+ Radu-Cristian FOTESCU + beranger5ca at yahoo.ca +
+ Wed Jul 13 11:17:31 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
Thanks. So I've got from 2 answers:
+
+
+> You should use libmagick-devel
+
+and:
+
+> Its' spec file must contain a virtual provides :
+> Provides:  libpoppler-qt4-devel
+
+Indeed, libmagick-devel, libwmf-devel, libchm-devel, libpoppler-qt4-devel, etc. do expand/match/find_provides correctly on 64-bit too!
+
+But then *why* some names have to be written as: 
+qt4-devel and *not* libqt4-devel
+python-devel and *not* libpython-devel
+?
+Isn't this an inconsistency?
+
+Moreover, excuse me, but I find it stupid to have a 64-bit lib called `libksane-devel`.  
+This is its full 64-bit name, *not* the name from BuildRequires! 
+It's another inconsistency IMHO.
+
+Of course, there is urpmq --provides to find out what resolves to the needed devel library, but still...
+
+Thank you all!
+
+R-C aka beranger
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1