From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006561.html | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006561.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006561.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006561.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006561.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2a0e614f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006561.html @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?

+ Romain d'Alverny + rdalverny at gmail.com +
+ Tue Jul 12 23:22:49 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 23:08, Balcaen John <mikala at mageia.org> wrote:
+> On Tuesday 12 July 2011 16:48:58 andre999 wrote:
+> [...]
+>>
+>> For all these reasons, I think that it is much more appropriate to wait to
+>> be approached by the patent holder.
+>> (If not ourselves, then some other distro.)
+> I hope you're not serious when writing thoses lines.
+
+Actually, this is what seems to be a standard process in the industry
+when you read the headlines.
+
+One doesn't hear about (software) patents when licensing occurs "as
+expected", but when someone in the industry challenges (or is
+challenged by) some other actor patent. Because that's the only way to
+prove a patent to be ineffective (for various reasons) before it
+expires.
+
+(I am not proposing one or the other option - and it's going out of
+the initial question in this thread - tmb reframed it well).
+
+Romain
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1