From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006483.html | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 121 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006483.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006483.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006483.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006483.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8a6940222 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006483.html @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Standardising the virtual Provides in -devel packages + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Standardising the virtual Provides in -devel packages

+ EatDirt + dirteat at gmail.com +
+ Fri Jul 8 13:44:48 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
On 08/07/11 06:37, Ahmad Samir wrote:
+> Hello.
+>
+> I've had a rather vague idea about standardising the virtual provides
+> in the distro, there should be:
+> Provides: %{name}-devel
+> Provides: lib%{name}-devel
+>
+> either both of them in _all_ packages, or one of them in _all_
+> packages, so that we don't have to check urpmq --provides all the
+> time. Personally, I am more inclined on having them both, so as not to
+> break already working specs.
+
+> WDYT?
+
+Hi! YES!!!!!!!
+
+As a Padawan, this was one of my first troubles, to find the correct 
+-devel package name. Some packages have even different --provides 
+according to the arch :-/
+
+Both "Provides" are certainly the best, but we may recommend the usage 
+of only one of type in Requires: lib%{name}-devel?
+
+Cheers,
+Chris.
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1