From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006477.html | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 135 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006477.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006477.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006477.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006477.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..248deb04b --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006477.html @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Updates testing + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Updates testing

+ nicolas vigier + boklm at mars-attacks.org +
+ Fri Jul 8 11:39:39 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011, andre999 wrote:
+
+> nicolas vigier a écrit :
+>> On Thu, 07 Jul 2011, Damien Lallement wrote:
+>>
+>>> Le 07/07/2011 14:18, nicolas vigier a écrit :
+>>>> On Wed, 06 Jul 2011, José Jorge wrote:
+>>>>
+>>>>> Le mercredi 6 juillet 2011 18:12:44, nicolas vigier a écrit :
+>>>>>> Hello,
+>>>>>>
+>>>>>> A few package updates need testing on x86_64 (they have been tested on
+>>>>>> i586, thanks to Dave Hodgins) :
+>>>>>>
+>>>>>> https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1944
+>>>>>> https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1485
+>>>>>> https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1892
+>>>>>> https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1939
+>>>>>
+>>>>> All tested, but without a testcase, some are hard to test.
+>>>>
+>>>> Yes, testcase need to be done for each package. Maybe we could have a
+>>>> wiki page to save all test cases, and use them when the same package is
+>>>> updated again ?
+>>>
+>>> No need to put this on the wiki as it will be useless for 90% of them as an
+>>> update request must have a test case for the bug fixed, not for the whole
+>>> package.
+>>
+>> Yes, for the test about the bug fixed. But isn't there tests to check for
+>> regressions ?
+>
+> The general idea sounds good.
+> But that would make a pretty big wiki page, if we especially if we include 
+> big apps like LibreOffice & Postgresql.
+> Maybe link each bigger app to a standing bugz report for that purpose ?
+> It would be pretty hard to make even close to complete regression tests for 
+> bigger apps as well.  (imagine 599 tests for LibreOffice ...)
+
+I think the goal is not to do full regression tests, as we don't have
+time for this. But do minimal testing, in 1 or 2 minutes, to check that
+basic functionality is still working, to check that the update didn't
+break everything. For LibreOffice that could be opening a test document.
+Most applications are easy to test. But some require knowledge of the
+software, or some configuration files, to test, so we could keep a list
+of test commands or things to do and config files. 
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1