From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006465.html | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006465.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006465.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006465.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006465.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..54b2a8247 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006465.html @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Updates testing + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Updates testing

+ Ahmad Samir + ahmadsamir3891 at gmail.com +
+ Fri Jul 8 06:22:38 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
On 7 July 2011 22:04, philippe makowski <makowski.mageia at gmail.com> wrote:
+> 2011/7/7 nicolas vigier <boklm at mars-attacks.org>:
+>> Yes, for the test about the bug fixed. But isn't there tests to check for
+>> regressions ?
+> when you push a new minor version (only bugfix) for softwares like
+> LibreOffice, Postgresql or Firebird for example, will the Mageia QA
+> team run tests for regression and for all bug fixed ?
+> whaaaa !
+>
+
+IMHO, for big packages like libreoffice, we'll have to rely on the
+free-cost-daily-usage QA, i.e. pushing it to Cauldron users for
+1-2month, and waiting till the dust settles before pushing to older
+stable releases.
+
+The interesting part about packages like libreoffice, is they're
+multi-purpose, so there's no easy way to make sure every functionality
+works(tm), other than actually letting testes/cauldron-users use it.
+
+-- 
+Ahmad Samir
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1