From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006446.html | 152 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 152 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006446.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006446.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006446.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006446.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7fba567b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006446.html @@ -0,0 +1,152 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Updates process is now available + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Updates process is now available

+ nicolas vigier + boklm at mars-attacks.org +
+ Thu Jul 7 17:57:04 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011, Damien Lallement wrote:
+
+> Le 07/07/2011 14:42, nicolas vigier a écrit :
+>> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Damien Lallement wrote:
+>>
+>>> Hello all,
+>>>
+>>> security, qa and sysadmin team worked on the qa/updates process to provide
+>>> updates as soon as possible.
+>>> All is now ready (boklm is finalizing a scrip to move updates from
+>>> "testing" to "updates"). This script will be uses by security team members
+>>> and a few QA people to push updates.
+>>>
+>>> You can now read:
+>>> - http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=updates_policy
+>>> - http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=qa_updates
+>>
+>> I have some questions about updates process :
+>>
+>> The page says to assign bug after validation :
+>> Assign the bug to security at groups.mageia.org if it's a security update
+>> (check that qa-bugs at ml.mageia.org is in 'CC')
+>> Let it assigned to qa-bugs at ml.mageia.org if it's a standard update
+>>
+>> Is it usefull to assign differently for security and non-security
+>> updates ?
+>>
+>> Could we add a keyword "validated_update" to bugs that are ready to be
+>> moved to updates, so they can be found easily ?
+>
+> I just write this because that's what was discuss on the meeting at this 
+> time with misc, ennael, stew and I (you were here too IIRC).
+> We can discuss this point again if needed. :-)
+>
+> The idea was just not to assign package to secteam if not a secteam update 
+> (not to distrub them for standard packages).
+
+Yes, but what is the difference between pushing standard update, and
+security update, after qa is done, and why should we disturb them for
+security updates, and not for standard updates ?
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1