From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006402.html | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006402.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006402.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006402.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006402.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3c9fdcee8 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006402.html @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?

+ nicolas vigier + boklm at mars-attacks.org +
+ Wed Jul 6 14:37:42 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011, Thorsten van Lil wrote:
+
+>
+> The reason why we have tainted is, that there are patents, which restrain 
+> some user to use this software. So, it's a question of legality, which 
+> should get the higher priority. The differentiation if it's free or 
+> not-free is only a question of ideology.
+>
+> Therefore, for me the situation is very simple. If there are questionable 
+> patents for a software, we have to put it in tainted (otherwise we destroy 
+> the whole idea of core/non-free/tainted). There is no other option. We may 
+
+There is other options. It would also be possible to not include nonfree
+patented software anywhere.
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1