From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006356.html | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006356.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006356.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006356.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006356.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b93f42bb3 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006356.html @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Rpmlint rejection of percent in the summary and name, svn one word commit + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Rpmlint rejection of percent in the summary and name, svn one word commit

+ Michael Scherer + misc at zarb.org +
+ Tue Jul 5 02:19:38 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
Hi,
+
+since it was asked quite a few time ( especially by thierry ) and since
+it broke the BS this afternoon, I took a look at the problem of
+unexpanded macro, and why rpmlint didn't catch it.
+
+And in fact, the problem was simply that the name of the check as
+changed. So this should be blocked now, and while I am on it, I am
+looking at the "one word per commit" problem.
+
+I pushed this ( not activated yet ) : 
+http://svnweb.mageia.org/adm/puppet/modules/subversion/templates/single_word_commit?revision=1809&view=markup
+
+But I am not sure if this is enough, or if this will not have unwanted
+side effect. 
+
+Do people have a opinion ?
+
+-- 
+Michael Scherer
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1