From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006326.html | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006326.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006326.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006326.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006326.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f38b17fd4 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006326.html @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Anybody having high CPU by kded4 after upgrading to 4.6.90? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Anybody having high CPU by kded4 after upgrading to 4.6.90?

+ Radu-Cristian FOTESCU + beranger5ca at yahoo.ca +
+ Mon Jul 4 14:10:24 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
+
+
+
+> It's not useless at all in fact. kdebase4-runtime was ony pulling by
+> internal requires lib(64)ntrack0 & lib(64)ntrack-qt4
+> using only  the «  built-in noop monitor (always online).», i did not
+> notice only yesterday night that his package was installed locally
+> (ntrack binary which provides
+> /usr/lib(64)/ntrack/modules/ntrack-libnl1.so.
+> Also it's strange that kded4 was fixed for you only today since i
+> pushed the new ntrack 3 days ago
+> when i noticed it the kde's bug you're referring in the last mail.
+
+
+mikala, I believe I've got it.
+
+I was only having  libntrack0  installed, but not  ntrack.
+Therefore, no matter a new ntrack was released on July 1, I wasn't getting it anyway.
+
+It was kdebase4-runtime-4.6.90-4.mga2, released today, July 4, that brought as a dependency the new ntrack!
+
+Fabulous. (Still, I'm wondering why Fedora Rawide doesn't use ntrack at all.)
+
+Thanks,
+R-C aka beranger
+
+ + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1