From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010754.html | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010754.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010754.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010754.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010754.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f8e5b52cf --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010754.html @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] License issues with readline (MariaDB) + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] License issues with readline (MariaDB)

+ Maarten Vanraes + alien at rmail.be +
+ Thu Dec 29 17:20:27 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
Op donderdag 29 december 2011 15:28:58 schreef Maarten Vanraes:
+
+as suspected, MariaDB cannot license as GPLv2+
+
+ok, so what do we do:
+
+A) follow upstream, and use bundled GPLv2 readline to link static against
+B) go back to readline-v5
+C) repackage debian's version of readline-gplv2 (afaik its a v5 maintained)
+D) ignore all this legal crap and just link shared with readline v6
+E) try to use libedit, but the spec files contain buildConflicts with it, so i'm 
+guessing it's for a good reason.
+
+
+debian does B)
+fedora does either A) or D), but definately static linked
+
+
+tbh: even though it's not right, my preference goes to D)
+
+my mariadb latest fix is just waiting to be pushed...
+
+please, i need comments and opinions ASAP!
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1