From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010569.html | 141 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 141 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010569.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010569.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010569.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010569.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ca87be481 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010569.html @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] RFP: commenting obsoletes for later removal + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] RFP: commenting obsoletes for later removal

+ Anssi Hannula + anssi at mageia.org +
+ Sat Dec 17 14:37:50 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
On 17.12.2011 15:13, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
+> Hi all,
+> 
+> Annsi, misc and myself were discussing obsoletes, and i think we should make a 
+> policy for a structured comment, so that later (in some timeperiod that's as 
+> of yet unspecified) we can remove older obsoletes in a structured way.
+> 
+> I propose we put a comment in the spec file, with the version the package will 
+> be first used, so likely that is cauldron, so example:
+> 
+> # Obsoletes: mga2
+> (before the obsolete line)
+> 
+> if noone objects, we can put the policy on the wiki somewhere
+> 
+
+For the record, I'd prefer e.g.
+
+# added 2011-04
+Obsoletes: foobar < 3.4
+
+-- 
+Anssi Hannula
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1