From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010446.html | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010446.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010446.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010446.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010446.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..612dfc0b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010446.html @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Package adoption campaign, 3 months later + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Package adoption campaign, 3 months later

+ Michael Scherer + misc at zarb.org +
+ Wed Dec 14 23:19:40 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
Le samedi 10 décembre 2011 à 12:14 +0100, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
+> You're explaining why having orphan packages is bad and it's hard to disagree, 
+> but I fail to see why such a mailing list for people who are ready to devote 
+> some time to orphan packages would make things worse. It's not because it's 
+> not the ideal solution that it's bad, is it?
+
+Because such a mailling list would just incite people to add package and
+never remove them, because "that's not really unmaintained, that's
+collectively maintained". Which is just a non sense.
+
+That's how it was in Mandriva, so the proposition is just not helping.
+
+Each time a cleaning was attempted, someone said "but come on, we are
+taking care of it collectively, so you cannot remove, it could still
+help". And so almost nothing was removed.
+
+I see no reason to think it will be different. Same situation, same
+spirit, same users, same outcome. 
+
+Either people agree that we should have no orphans, and then the list is
+useless, or they think we should keep orphans, and then this is causing
+issues. Middle ground ( like "let's keep orphan for X months" ) are just
+a variation of the first one, and so we would just be discussing the
+duration.
+
+So let's try to make a proposal, if there is a list, after how many
+months should a package be removed from the repository if not maintained
+( and by maintained, I do not say "not changes or anything", I really
+mean "no one listed as maintainer" ) ?
+
+-- 
+Michael Scherer
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1