[Mageia-dev] [135989]

Tue Aug 30 04:21:12 CEST 2011

2011/8/29 John Balcaen <mikala at mageia.org>:
+> 2011/8/29  <root at mageia.org>:
+>> Revision 135989 Author ze Date 2011-08-29 08:09:56 +0200 (Mon, 29 Aug 2011)
+>>
+>> Log Message
+>>
+>> - cmake its already builrequires by kde-macros
+>> - this way we dont force building strictly  with OpenJDK
+>> - remove clean section (done by default)
+>> - simple way to list dirs
+>> - set requires in devel package to release like hapens for restant packages
+>>
+>> Modified Paths
+>>
+>> cauldron/soprano/current/SPECS/soprano.spec
+>>
+>> Modified: cauldron/soprano/current/SPECS/soprano.spec
+>> ===================================================================
+>> --- cauldron/soprano/current/SPECS/soprano.spec       2011-08-29 05:21:36 UTC (rev
+>> 135988)
+>> +++ cauldron/soprano/current/SPECS/soprano.spec       2011-08-29 06:09:56 UTC (rev
+> [...]
+>>
+>>  %if %with_java
+>> -BuildRequires: java-rpmbuild
+>> +BuildRequires: java-devel
+>>  BuildRequires: chrpath
+>>  %endif
+> This is stupid.
+>
+>>  Conflicts: soprano-devel < 4:2.6.51-2
+>>  Suggests: soprano-plugin-virtuoso = %{epoch}:%version
+>>
+>> @@ -55,8 +52,8 @@
+>>  %defattr(-,root,root)
+>>  %_bindir/sopranocmd
+>>  %_bindir/sopranod
+>> -%dir %_datadir/soprano
+>> -%_datadir/soprano/rules
+>> +%dir %_datadir/soprano/
+>
+> I guess i forgot the the purpose of %dir so could you explain me the difference
+> between %dir %datadir/soprano & %dir %datadir/soprano/ ?
+>
+> [...]
+>
+>> -Provides: libsoprano-devel = %{epoch}:%version-%release
+>> -Requires: %libsoprano = %{epoch}:%version-%release
+>> -Requires: %libsopranoclient = %{epoch}:%version-%release
+>> -Requires: %libsopranoserver = %{epoch}:%version-%release
+>> -Requires: %libsopranoindex = %{epoch}:%version-%release
+>> -Requires: %name = %{epoch}:%version-%release
+>> -Requires: %{name}-plugin-virtuoso = %{epoch}:%version-%release
+>> -Requires: %{name}-plugin-redland = %{epoch}:%version-%release
+>> +Provides: libsoprano-devel = %{epoch}:%version
+>> +Requires: %libsoprano = %{epoch}:%version
+>> +Requires: %libsopranoclient = %{epoch}:%version
+>> +Requires: %libsopranoserver = %{epoch}:%version
+>> +Requires: %libsopranoindex = %{epoch}:%version
+>> +Requires: %name = %{epoch}:%version
+>> +Requires: %{name}-plugin-virtuoso = %{epoch}:%version
+>> +Requires: %{name}-plugin-redland = %{epoch}:%version
+> It's quite different of what you wrote in the description...
+> Here you set the requires to %version & not to %release...
+> Also it's quite different how we create requires on library packages
+> on other kde's related packages (since we're using
+> %epoch:%version-%release)
+> but since you already talk with yourself for this change i guess you
+> can surely share the reason for this change.
+>
+> Well i don't care anymore i guess..
+
+Yes the commit coment was incorrect, what i wanted to say was this:
+- set requires in devel package to version like hapens for restant packages
+
+Since all soprano packages have requires to version (except the devel
+package), i just put the devel requires also to version, that way we
+had soprano requires only to version.
+See if we were really acting as a team then i would replade restant
+soprano packages to have requires to release instead changing then to
+version, but you with dmorgan have put me simply apart, so how could
+you expect me to do things other way if you with dmorgan have simply
+alienated me.
+
+You were also who started doing all by own way, you didnt discuss with
+me anychanges, for example the changes you made in wiki.
+For example you add severall items to Golds section without discussing
+any, they should be first added as proposals so that could be first
+discussed in a meeing.
+But for you theres no kde team, since you just do what it pleases you.
+But now you should be even more pleased since now dmorgan in the kde
+packaging policy wiki page have put that now in a PENDING status.
+
+I know very well from where comes all that dmorgan animosityagainst
+me, mem and dmorgan is the past have already had divergencies, so let
+you know that this simply dodnt appear out of the blue, there are a
+history regarding dmorgan and me.
+
+Before dmorgan appear we were going ok, of course we had some
+discussions but thats normal, but its not normal that without any
+proper reason dmorgan did talked to me with some "tone" and
+"aggressiveness".
+
+You even said that i would be happy if you left Mageia, and like i
+answered in other thread you were too far from the truth, you are a
+person that are always contributing, that put much effort to help
+Mageia, and no one in his perfect mind would think was good to put
+away some person with those capabilities.
+
+Some of my latest commits were correct and simple (for eexamplein
+kdelibs4), and they were reverted by dmorgan based in a rule that he
+created, and that rule was simply put by him, without any discusion,
+no one were asked about and i never agreed with it, he simply said
+"and now i take my sysadmin hat..." and did it.
+
+So from that point what would be the purpose to discuss any with you
+since no one can diverge from you, when that happens dmorgan appears
+and "takes his sysadmin hat..." and rises his tone saying i cant do
+this or that.
+Seamsn now you and dmorgan own kde.
+
+Your behaviour has changed mainly from the day that misc attacked me
+without knowing all facts, so from that point all that was being done
+as team SIMPLY didsappeared, and you didnt even said nothing about
+what dmorgan did, saying that my commits should be reviewed all by
+you, that is abusive, and if remember correctly untill that day we act
+as a team, and you be havior from that changed and severall times you
+rised your tone just like that for almost nothing.
+
+I always wanted that we could all could get along with each other, of
+course we would have some discussions (thats normal, and its from
+discussions that development grows), and from that we would reach
+agreements and consensus about what to do or follow.
+
+I think if we continued as a team without dmorgan interventions we
+would continue in the right path for Mageia grow and stability.
+
+And again i appeal that we can that we could have a meeting so that
+all could be discussed and defined, so that now we should act as a
+whole without any frictions.
+Like i satated im not here to fight or bash no one, but to act as a
+part of a whole.
+
+Yesterday i was about to remove me completly from Mageia, since i dont
+want to be in a place where someone can have abusice behaviours and no
+appears to regulate that sittuation.
+Mikala mayve this was your wish, since what have been happening its
+far from a community behaviour and you may see that im very different
+from Fwang, some that you have referred severall tmes that he changes
+things without discussing any, thing that i did used to do as a team,
+but my latest commit was something i did to see at what point things
+would go, and again i can see dmorgan can do everything he wants like
+now put me as a pending status regarding the kde team.
+
+-- 
+Zé
+