From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-August/007485.html | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-August/007485.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-August/007485.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-August/007485.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-August/007485.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..00386025f --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-August/007485.html @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] [134638] - clean spec + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] [134638] - clean spec

+ Michael Scherer + misc at zarb.org +
+ Wed Aug 24 12:24:04 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
Le mardi 23 août 2011 à 17:22 +0200, Marja van Waes a écrit :
+> Op 23-08-11 16:43, Michael Scherer schreef:
+> 
+> >
+> > So when the macro do something more, yes we need to use it.
+> > If not, and if we want to follow others distribution, we should take a
+> > look at their policy
+> >
+> > I found the one of Fedora on
+> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Macros , and
+> > basically, they say "use rm rather than %{_rm}".
+> >
+> > If someone can find the one of Suse or others, that would help use to
+> > see if a consensus emerge
+> >
+> Is this: http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Conventions_RPM_Macros
+> what you're looking for?
+> 
+
+Nope, but this is interesting none the less, especialy new ways to
+torture packager^W^W increase quality of the distribution with others
+rpmlint checks :
+http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_checks#rpmlint_checks_in_openSUSE
+-- 
+Michael Scherer
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1