From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-August/007376.html | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 129 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-August/007376.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-August/007376.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-August/007376.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-August/007376.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3635d5d22 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-August/007376.html @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Possible failure in our update process + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Possible failure in our update process

+ John Balcaen + mikala at mageia.org +
+ Thu Aug 18 17:46:06 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
Hello,
+
+I noticed a problem with our update process thanks to bug #2450 [1]
+Here we pushed a update to kipi-plugins package (due to a missing
+requires) but the update ends up in a totally broken installation for
+the end user which was not noticed by me (first in fault) & later by
+QA.
+
+Currently every package built for updates are done against
+core/release, core/updates and core/updates_testing, here when i
+pushed kipi-plugins update, KDE 4.6.5 was already available in
+core/updates_testing so as expected kipi-plugins get linked against
+KDE 4.6.5 & not against KDE 4.6.3 (available in core/release)
+Since most of actors of the QA are simply installing all packages from
+core/updates_testing  (like me) none of us noticed that it would break
+ without KDE 4.6.5 installed and when probably for first updates
+people are using a « fresh Mageia 1» , with several packages in
+updates_testing in the same moment we can't really expect them to
+removed or reinstall/restore a Mageia 1 for every package available in
+testing.
+
+A workaround (which could also ease work for QA people) would be to
+have some temporary repositories as suggested by bolkm on irc, it
+could be based on SRPM package name but for some project like KDE  it
+would need more hacks since RPMS needed to be builded in a specific
+order.
+
+The QA user will be able to simply add a new media (like
+urpmi.addmedia $mirror/core/updates_testing/packagetotest/ ) so it
+will be more easy to test a package & *only* this one.
+
+Another solution is to rebuild the package when moving in on
+core/updates_release but in that case the package tested by QA is of
+course not the same as the one available previously in testing.
+
+What do you think ?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+[1] https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2450
+
+
+-- 
+Balcaen John
+Jabber-id: mikala at jabber.littleboboy.net
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1