From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-August/007374.html | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 101 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-August/007374.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-August/007374.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-August/007374.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-August/007374.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2cfa22c9e --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-August/007374.html @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Providing 32-bit flash-player-plugin in x86_64 nonfree? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Providing 32-bit flash-player-plugin in x86_64 nonfree?

+ Anssi Hannula + anssi.hannula at iki.fi +
+ Thu Aug 18 17:34:14 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
On 05.06.2011 02:31, Anssi Hannula wrote:
+> Hi!
+> 
+> Currently our flash-player-plugin pkg is only built on 32-bit, as the
+> 64-bit adobe build is still horribly out of date.
+> 
+> However, this is problematic for 64-bit users, as installing the 32-bit
+> flash-player-plugin is cumbersome as nonfree32 media is not added on
+> 64-bit (and adding it would not be very nice, as the media list is
+> already way too cluttered).
+> 
+> One option would be to build a x86_64 package that actually contains the
+> 32-bit flash player (and note that in description), with a dependency on
+> nspluginwrapper. When a proper 64-bit build is released by adobe, it
+> would be replaced with the 64-bit player.
+> 
+> Do you think this should be done, or would it add too much confusion?
+
+Since there wasn't any big opposition to this, I'll be submitting it
+shortly. Feel free to complain now :)
+
+-- 
+Anssi Hannula
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1