[Mageia-dev] help packaging lilypond

Thu Aug 11 05:46:13 CEST 2011

On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 12:03:17 am Jani Välimaa wrote:
+> 2011/8/10 Jani Välimaa <jani.valimaa at gmail.com>:
+> > 2011/8/10 Thomas Spuhler <thomas at btspuhler.com>:
+> >> Thanks for fixing the spec file and submit the package.
+> >> I have a comment and a few questions. First the comment.
+> >> an experienced packager telling someone like me (and others not so
+> >> experienced packagers)  why the package build failed that built just a
+> >> few month ago would have helped learning how to fix things. Now the
+> >> package is built and I still don't know what the error message meant.
+> > 
+> > The build failed because now there are some checks which prevents
+> > uploading "erroneus" packages. Check for empty %post and %preun is one
+> > of those added checks. There's no such macro as %update_scrollkeeper
+> > (or  %clean_scrollkeeper) so that's why your build failed. See 'rpm
+> > --eval %update_scrollkeeper'
+> > 
+> >> why can the scrollkeepr script be removed as not required when it was
+> >> required not so long ago and other distributions use it too. It
+> >> supposed to be there if you have omf files, and yes lilypond-doc has
+> >> such files
+> > 
+> > It was me who removed the scrollkeeper reqs as I only looked at %files
+> > section and noticed there was no %{_datadir}/omf/ entry. The
+> > filetriggers looks
+> 
+> Oopsie, somehow managed to push the send button.. Anyways, the
+> filetriggers only looks .omf files from /usr/share/omf/ and now after
+> checking I see in lilypond they're hiding in somewhere else and out of
+> filetriggers reach. I think the fix would be moving them to a correct
+> place to be "available" for filetriggers (and add back reqs I
+> removed).
+> 
+> >> Can you please explain this in more details? I would appreciate it.
+> > 
+> > Sure
+
+I guess the current build works. I have been a user for a long time and 
+haven't seen any problems.
+The relase version should have come out on the 8th. as soon as it shows up, 
+will build it.
+
+-- 
+Thomas
+