From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101225/001897.html | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101225/001897.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101225/001897.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101225/001897.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101225/001897.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a7a2f4784 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101225/001897.html @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla

+ Ahmad Samir + ahmadsamir3891 at gmail.com +
+ Sat Dec 25 21:20:34 CET 2010 +

+
+ +
On 25 December 2010 02:04, andre999 <andr55 at laposte.net> wrote:
+>
+[...]
+
+> In my mind, it is triage and QA who would benefit the most from such a list.
+
+Not really, QA and Triage already use Sophie
+http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=irc#sophie
+
+> It seems if we were to have such a list, that it might be better to make it
+> a separate (web) application, which could be referred to in a separtate
+> tab/window, so it is charged only once for reviewing a number of bugs.
+> But if triage/QA is not interested, it is better to avoid this big list.
+>
+> Another thought : maybe we should have separate rpm and srpm fields.
+> Because end-users will relate more to ordinary rpm's, several of which could
+> be generated by the same srpm.
+> Do you think that would be useful ?
+>
+> my 2 cents :)
+>
+> André
+>
+>
+
+One field is enough, a package maintainer knows what rpms come from
+which of his SRPMs. The RPM Package field main goal is indicating
+where the bug exists as that's where it'll, hopefully, get fixed.
+
+-- 
+Ahmad Samir
+
+ + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1