[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla

Thu Dec 23 21:01:05 CET 2010

Le jeudi 23 décembre 2010 20:44:14, Michael scherer a écrit :
+> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:34:35PM +0100, Samuel Verschelde wrote:
+> > Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010 21:25:39, Michael scherer a écrit :
+> > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 01:55:02PM +0100, Frederic Janssens wrote:
+> > > > On 2010-12-22, Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org> wrote:
+> > > > > Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010 à 00:32 +0100, Frederic Janssens a 
+écrit :
+> > > > On https://qa.mandriva.com/ anything goes.
+> > > > To permit consistent searches I think we should standardise.
+> > > > The aim would to be to as specific as needed but not more;
+> > > > as far as I know that would be :
+> > > > 
+> > > > name-version-release
+> > > > 
+> > > > unless the bug is architecture specific, where we would have :
+> > > > 
+> > > > name-version-release.architecture
+> > > 
+> > > There is already a "architecture" field, afaik, as well as a version
+> > > field, no ?
+> > > 
+> > > ( I didn't check as I refuse to enter my password over a insecured http
+> > > session ).
+> > > 
+> > > And I think that giving rpm ( and not srpm ) will make search a little
+> > > bit complex in some corner cases ( can will also cause problem for the
+> > > next point ).
+> > 
+> > So you think the (S)RPM field should only contain SRPM filenames ?
+> 
+> No, just the srpm name.
+> At least from a data point of view.
+> 
+> > If yes, I agree with that, because as Frederic stated above, in current
+> > Mandriva bugzilla, there's no enforced rule for that. You can put
+> > anything in the field, and you often end up with rpm filenames, or
+> > simple package names (e.g. "virtualbox").
+> > 
+> > However asking bug reporters to know the SRPM is too much, so this rule
+> > can only be enforced on Packagers and Triage Team side I think. This is
+> > already how it works on qa.mandriva.com : if you know the SRPM, you put
+> > it, if not someone will triage and do it for you.
+> 
+> Well, that's more a UI question, and so it should be decoralated from the
+> way we store data in the DB.  ( now, it may be hard to achieve, but I am
+> sure that templates + ajax could do miracle, like "enter the name of rpm
+> here" and have it searched with js to fill the proper input ).
+
+I remember some years ago you could choose the exact version of the package 
+for which you reported a bug, from a list. I agree that improving the UI side 
+helpers could be useful.
+
+Regards
+
+Samuel Verschelde
+