From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101222/001863.html | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101222/001863.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101222/001863.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101222/001863.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101222/001863.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..08d8fd33c --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101222/001863.html @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla

+ Maarten Vanraes + maarten.vanraes at gmail.com +
+ Wed Dec 22 23:29:42 CET 2010 +

+
+ +
Op woensdag 22 december 2010 23:25:16 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
+> Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010 22:58:44, andre999 a écrit :
+> > Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
+> > > Op woensdag 22 december 2010 20:38:06 schreef Ahmad Samir:
+> > >> On 22 December 2010 21:30, Renaud MICHEL<r.h.michel+mageia at gmail.com>
+> > > 
+> > > wrote:
+> > >>> On mercredi 22 décembre 2010 at 18:46, Ahmad Samir wrote :
+> > >>>>> Sorry for not beeing clear.
+> > >>>>> What I propose is not for the case 'a bug originates from more than
+> > >>>>> one package';
+> > >>>>> but for the case 'a bug manifests itself in than one package'.
+> > 
+> > If we agree that a bug can originate in more than one package, a
+> > multiline (multi-rpm) field could be useful.
+> 
+> No need for a multiline field. If we agree that the field, by convention,
+> can contain one rpm name (common case) or more, separated by commas for
+> example, then it wont add complexity over the initial proposal from Ahmad
+> and would still allow people to flag more RPMs if they want.
+> 
+> From the bug solving point of view, this would not add much benefit, but
+> for users it may bring some useful information, for example in
+> mageia-app-db. Indeed, like it was said earlier, if the problem shows in
+> package A but is in fact a bug in package B, it's still useful to have
+> package A mentioned so that we can say, on the package's page in
+> mageia-app-db "Hey, there's a known open bug for this package".
+> 
+> 
+> Regards
+> 
+> Samuel Verschelde
+
+
+good compromise
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1