[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla

Wed Dec 22 13:55:02 CET 2010

On 2010-12-22, Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org> wrote:
+> Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010 à 00:32 +0100, Frederic Janssens a écrit :
+>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 17:07, Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org> wrote:
+>> >
+>> > Le mardi 14 décembre 2010 à 17:05 +0100, Dexter Morgan a écrit :
+>> > > I would like to have your input to let us able to provide a bugzilla
+>> > > really soon
+>> >
+>> > So if I am not wrong, in bugzilla, we have :
+>> > - products
+>> > - component, contained in products
+>> > - and various field, per bug,
+>> >
+>> > and the way we organize everything will impact the layout.
+>> >
+>>
+>> Yes.
+>>
+>> In preparation of the future interaction (by xmlrpc) between the
+>> mageia-app-db site and the mageia bugzilla,  I have been testing
+>> http://bugs.mageia.org/ .
+>> Xmlrpc works, but it will be necessary to configure additional fields.
+>> The minimum would be to add an 'RPM Package' field (such as exists on
+>> https://qa.mandriva.com/).
+>
+> What about component not related to rpm ?
+
+The 'RPM Package' field would be left blank.
+(usually many fields are left blank)
+
+>
+> And do you mean srpm or rpm ?
+
+On https://qa.mandriva.com/ anything goes.
+To permit consistent searches I think we should standardise.
+The aim would to be to as specific as needed but not more;
+as far as I know that would be :
+
+name-version-release
+
+unless the bug is architecture specific, where we would have :
+
+name-version-release.architecture
+
+>
+> We should also take in account package naming change.
+
+which change?
+
+>
+> --
+> Michael Scherer
+>
+>
+
+
+-- 
+
+Frederic
+