From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101221/001826.html | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101221/001826.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101221/001826.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101221/001826.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101221/001826.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6fa9ba8fe --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101221/001826.html @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] maintainers database + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] maintainers database

+ nicolas vigier + boklm at mars-attacks.org +
+ Tue Dec 21 10:40:29 CET 2010 +

+
+ +
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, andre999 wrote:
+
+>
+> We could have a structure something like this :
+>
+> Primary key : name of package
+>
+> Other fields, 1:1 relation :
+> - package rpm category (+ subcategory, if any)
+
+What is the category ?
+
+> - repository
+> - etc
+>
+> Other fields, 1:N relation :
+> - Packager nickname + packager status (primary maintainer, trainee or 
+> whatever) + real name + email
+> (The last 2 items could be in a separate table keyed by nickname.)
+
+Why duplicate infos from ldap database ? And why would we need that in
+maintainers db ?
+
+>
+> - Package dependancies (names of other packages)
+
+Why would we need that in maintainers db ?
+
+> - Package provides (names of other packages)
+
+Why would we need that in maintainers db ?
+
+
+ + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1