From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101221/001823.html | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101221/001823.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101221/001823.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101221/001823.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101221/001823.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ef1edebd2 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101221/001823.html @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] maintainers database + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] maintainers database

+ Luca Berra + bluca at vodka.it +
+ Tue Dec 21 08:03:16 CET 2010 +

+
+ +
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:06:36PM +0100, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
+>For instance:
+> * instead of having a single maintainer for a given package, have
+>several maintainers (with an admin maybe) over a given package (easy);
+yes please
+
+> * should there be groups of packages defined? (this adds/replicates
+>some logic that may already be somewhere else)
+this can be useful, many desktop environments consist of more than one
+core package and development/packaging should be coordinated, so it
+makes sense.
+
+> * should there be explicity groups of maintainers? or implicit (as
+>made of people maintaining the same package)?
+i think explicit
+
+L.
+-- 
+Luca Berra -- bluca at vodka.it
+
+ + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1