From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101217/001774.html | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101217/001774.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101217/001774.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101217/001774.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101217/001774.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..202e2303f --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101217/001774.html @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] maintainers database + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] maintainers database

+ Romain d'Alverny + rdalverny at gmail.com +
+ Fri Dec 17 23:55:39 CET 2010 +

+
+ +
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 23:41, Maarten Vanraes
+<maarten.vanraes at gmail.com> wrote:
+> imo, it could be used into mageia-app-db, allthough the purposes are a bit
+> different.
+
+So it should be a separate component.
+
+> however, if we plan on using ldap to store the maintainership (it would be
+> more like groups for each package and people being member of it...), then
+> perhaps it should be in catdap.
+
+I'm not sure this should be put into the LDAP, but I may be wrong. The
+data model is likely to change often enough (even if not a lot) and
+queries are likely to be frequent enought, to justify a separate,
+simple db/app for that. But here again, I may not have all the infos.
+
+> however, we will have need of this soon; and it should also take into account
+> co-maintainers...
+
+That's the group thing, yes (be it explicit or implicit).
+
+Romain
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1