From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101214/001727.html | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101214/001727.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101214/001727.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101214/001727.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101214/001727.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c68156670 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101214/001727.html @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Mirror layout + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout

+ Romain d'Alverny + rdalverny at gmail.com +
+ Tue Dec 14 13:02:28 CET 2010 +

+
+ +
Le 13 déc. 2010 à 13:50, Philippe DIDIER <philippedidier at laposte.net> a écrit :
+> The creator of a software can be prosecuted on the basis of patents even
+> if they were registered later !!!!
+
+Of course, nothing new here. 
+
+That does not, however, prove that the motive of the prosecution (hence the prosecution itself) is valid.
+
+Because of unprecise/unvalid registration, prior art, fuzzy/broken status of software patents in the EU, or other reason that would have to be demonstrated during a trial.
+
+So whatever you do, as soon as you publish/release some "hot" technology, you have to be aware of the environment; it is a matter of risk management, and of provisioning the means for such a trial (legal counselling, money, communication, disclosure), should it happen (that is, should it be reasonably worth it for someone to initiate).
+
+
+Cheers,
+
+Romain
+
+ + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1