From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101210/001685.html | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101210/001685.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101210/001685.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101210/001685.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101210/001685.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b90562ae4 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101210/001685.html @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Mirror layout + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout

+ Romain d'Alverny + rdalverny at gmail.com +
+ Fri Dec 10 16:45:50 CET 2010 +

+
+ +
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 16:35, Wolfgang Bornath <molch.b at googlemail.com> wrote:
+> Isn't this what this whole discussion is about? There ARE legal issues
+> with some software users regard as "must have". Now, how do you avoid
+> these issues?
+
+To summarize, strategies:
+ 1. ignore the issues and see what happens;
+ 2. ignore the less significant ones;
+ 3. get to know each of these and manage case by case
+ 4. other?
+
+and factor whenever possible and see what happens, update, repeat.
+
+1. and 2. are more radical, but are some sort of trial-and-error, risk
+management strategies. Ok... looking at it this way won't lead us
+further I guess.
+
+Let's try this: what if we consider, at first, that software patents
+were a non-issue? (that is, we just consider they are all invalid as
+such).
+
+How would this change/simplify the problem?
+ - for packaging/shipping the distribution
+ - for mirroring it
+ - for using it.
+
+(please don't go "but there _are_ software patents" for now)
+
+
+Romain
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1