From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101208/001656.html | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101208/001656.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101208/001656.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101208/001656.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101208/001656.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e8861a16c --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101208/001656.html @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Mirror layout : Why validate software patents ? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout : Why validate software patents ?

+ Wolfgang Bornath + molch.b at googlemail.com +
+ Wed Dec 8 10:39:49 CET 2010 +

+
+ +
2010/12/8 Ahmad Samir <ahmadsamir3891 at gmail.com>:
+>
+> For Fedora, being the most legally-challenged distro around, they
+> don't include any patented software in their official repos at all,
+> not even mp3 playback is possible in a default install. They even
+> don't include any non-free stuff, so no nVidia and ATI proprietary
+> drivers. Fedora users use some 3rd party repos, e.g. RPM Fusion
+> http://rpmfusion.org/
+
+Thx, so it's the same as with Mandriva wrt patented software.
+What I wanted to say: distributing no patented software at all is not
+the same as "having no extra repository for patented software", so are
+Mandriva and Fedora seen as "justifying patent sharks" as andre999
+descibed it?
+
+-- 
+wobo
+
+ + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1