[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two

Fri Dec 3 01:55:26 CET 2010

Op donderdag 02 december 2010 08:20:15 schreef andre999:
+> Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
+> > Op woensdag 01 december 2010 21:54:48 schreef andre999:
+> > [...]
+> > 
+> > allthough interesting, this thread is about mirror layout; and is not
+> > about removing the distinction between supported packages and not. (this
+> > wasn't all that clear to me at first.)
+> 
+> I'll discuss further down why I think that this is a critical part of
+> the question.
+> 
+> > i do understand that you think other methods of having the distinction
+> > might not work; i have reservations myself that way. (i do feel the
+> > disctinction is important.)
+> 
+> Glad to see that you understand my concerns.
+> 
+> > i also see that mirror layout should be as easy as possible for mirror
+> > admins.
+> 
+> Agreed.  However keeping an extra set of repositories for core packages
+> would just add a few extra directories (without changing the number/size
+> of their total content), thus have little impact on mirror administration.
+
+One would think so; however, a few people who replied where mirror 
+administrators; and it seems, IIUC that they said it does have impact.
+
+I'm just gonna trust their judgement on this, since they know more about this 
+than myself.
+
+[... snipping tainted stuff...] 
+> In any case, rsync is a pretty straight-forward application.
+> 
+> > however, looking at the big picture, i think that logically it's sounds
+> > to have one purpose to one thing; and thus for the mirror layout; only
+> > the mirror admins should be looked at; the viewpoint of a user _should_
+> > not really matter.
+> 
+> I agree that the user viewpoint is not of major importance : I see that
+> as just a positive side effect.
+> 
+> I am trying to look at the big picture.  And perhaps I haven't been very
+> effective at expressing my concerns.
+> In my mind, we should always consider important side effects of major
+> changes.  And removing separate "core"/"extra" (or "main"/"contrib"
+> repositories does have an important side effect.
+> Realigning "core" so it is really core should very much help packagers,
+> as well as maintaining an important distinction.
+> 
+> Note that if, down the road, we find another effective method for
+> distinquishing core / non-core, it is relatively simple to transfer
+> packages in "extra" to "core".
+> But if we eliminate the parallel set of repositories, and find later
+> that we have a problem giving priority to core packages, moving in the
+> other direction would be a much more difficult process.
+
+IIRC someone with experience said in this thread that we could always go to 
+that sort of scenario if like this it wouldn't work well. Again, i'm gonna 
+trust their judgement on this.
+
+> The suggestion that we only transfer to Mageia packages that we see as
+> important to keep, sounds like a very good approach.
+> This would also facilitate maintaining the core / non-core distinction.
+
+I suppose, however, I think that developers are their own users; they write 
+for theirselves; hence people will pull what they think is important for them.
+
+but at the very least, since it's something they will use, it'll at least be 
+tested some. (even if QA doesn't test it)
+
+> I'm not trying to say that defining core / non-core in detail is a
+> trivial process.  But it is in the interest of Mageia to define it.
+> 
+> I realise, at least at first, that things will be more difficult for
+> packagers.  But firmly believe that this will be largely alleviated by a
+> careful triage of existing "main" and "contrib" packages.
+> Thus I am more than willing to put in a lot of effort, since it will
+> have an important impact on the future of Mageia.
+> 
+> I also realise that many of those proposing eliminating a set of repos
+> have a lot of valuable experience.  And I'm sure that if/when we can
+> agree on this concern, that we will be able to work very well together.
+> And I look forward to becoming a Mageia packager.
+> 
+> another 2 cents :)
+> 
+> - André
+

[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two

[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two

[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two

[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two

[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two

[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two

[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two

[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two

[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two

[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two

3 December 2010 Archives by author

3 December 2010 Archives by date

3 December 2010 Archives by subject

3 December 2010 Archives by thread