From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101022/001336.html | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 105 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101022/001336.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101022/001336.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101022/001336.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101022/001336.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..16a68ad23 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101022/001336.html @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Mirror tree structure + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Mirror tree structure

+ Remy CLOUARD + shikamaru at mandriva.org +
+ Fri Oct 22 16:36:48 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 02:56:04AM +0200, Maarten Vanraes wrote:
+> Op donderdag 21 oktober 2010 22:38:19 schreef Olivier Thauvin:
+> > * Maarten Vanraes (maarten.vanraes at gmail.com) wrote:
+> > > Op woensdag 20 oktober 2010 18:34:24 schreef Olivier Thauvin:
+> > > > Hi,
+> > > > 
+> > > > You can find here:
+> > > > http://distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr/pub/linux/Mageia/
+> > > > the current mirror tree proposal.
+> > > > We now have to discuss it, I think.
+> > > 
+> > > i didn't follow the whole previous discussion about the mirror tree, but
+> > > would it be advisable to have a noarch subdir, next to i586 and x86_64 ?
+> > 
+> > This is not on my side. The internal distribution tree structure is more
+> > related to build system than the global mirror tree structure.
+> > 
+> > At least, the tree I am suggesting neither deny it, neither make it
+> > easier.
+> 
+> That is true, however from a globabl mirror pov; it kind of makes sense:
+> 
+> suppose people would want to do the arm or other ports, the noarch packages 
+> can be exactly the same; therefor there is no need to list the noarch packages 
+> in i586 and having them symlinked or whatever to x86_64 which will have larger 
+> .cz and people will need to mirror both if they want x86_64 only, etc...
+Actually, that’s exactly the point where it’s uncomfortable to have
+noarch outside the arch tree.
+
+If we only had i586 and x86_64 things would be quite simple, because
+packages are built at the same time. Now consider more exotic arch: You
+have to have machines that will compile for this arch. The problem is
+that they might be lagging behind a bit if they’re not powerful enough,
+or if we don’t have a sufficient number of machines.
+
+If some noarch packages depend on arch dependant packages, and these
+packages are not uptodate for arch $foo, that will lead to broken
+packages in this arch.
+
+Thus, having noarch packages outside the $foo tree is not feasible at
+the moment.
+
+Please also note that cross-compile is not an option either (but I’m not
+an expert in this area to explain it in details).
+
+Regards,
+-- 
+Rémy CLOUARD
+() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
+/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
+
+ + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1