From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101018/001270.html | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101018/001270.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101018/001270.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101018/001270.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101018/001270.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..41e319c07 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101018/001270.html @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Q: how long should we able to upgrade from? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Q: how long should we able to upgrade from?

+ Thierry Vignaud + thierry.vignaud at gmail.com +
+ Mon Oct 18 16:30:51 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
On 18 October 2010 00:31, Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org> wrote:
+> While I cannot answer, i think we should indeed try to have a policy for
+> this.
+>
+> And in fact, I would also try to remove older Conflicts and Obsoletes
+> from specs files, as this only add useless computation on urpmi side.
+
+I'm not against that.
+We could probably drop some old tags.
+The issue is how do we detect "old tags"???
+What's more I fear that the amount of old hacks is a very small
+proportion of the grand total.
+Though we can safely remove hackkernel provides :-)
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1