From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101018/001263.html | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101018/001263.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101018/001263.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101018/001263.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101018/001263.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4514e6b63 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101018/001263.html @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?

+ Wolfgang Bornath + molch.b at googlemail.com +
+ Mon Oct 18 10:18:53 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
Here's the result of the German community.
+After the initial opening of the poll there was a discussion with more
+than 40 postings, still going on. Involved were people actively using
+ArchLinux, members of our packaging team and interested users. Voters
+had the chance to alter their vote during the discussion, which was
+used by some who learned more about "rolling release" during the
+discussion.
+
+
+* Exactly as Mandriva, 6 months release cycle     4%
+* Exactly as Mandriva, 12 months release cycle   20%
+* 6 months cycle for core, rolling release model for other software  13%
+* 12 months cycle for core, rolling release model for other software 41%
+* Rolling release     22%
+
+With 54 % this is a majority for the "rolling light" model (where the
+12 months cycle for core received the most votes). Remarkable is the
+fact that the Mandriva release cycle (6 months) came in last.
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1