From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101016/001236.html | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101016/001236.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101016/001236.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101016/001236.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101016/001236.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6d32825bf --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101016/001236.html @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Q: how long should we able to upgrade from? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Q: how long should we able to upgrade from?

+ Thierry Vignaud + thierry.vignaud at gmail.com +
+ Sat Oct 16 18:07:54 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
On 16 October 2010 13:33, Luca Berra <bluca at vodka.it> wrote:
+>
+> I maintain some package that has multiple spec and initscript hacks to
+> allow upgrading since 2005LE to current cooker (i.e. postfix). I really
+> believe it is too far and that some should be pruned.
+> The question is, how long should we maintain suck
+> hacks in packages?
+
+2005LE???
+even in MandrivaLinux, you should have care only about 2008.0, 2009.1,
+2010.x, CS4 & MES5
+See http://www2.mandriva.com/en/support/lifecycle/
+As for Mageia, I would say we shouldn't care about the past but for
+the smooth upgrade path.
+Aka we shouldn't care if packages aren't backportable on anything
+older than 2010.1 but we should care about updating mdv
+2009.1/2010.x/CS4/MES5 to mageia which should help packaging quite a
+lot.
+My 2 €cents
+
+ + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1