From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101014/001164.html | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101014/001164.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101014/001164.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101014/001164.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101014/001164.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..042f06da3 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101014/001164.html @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?

+ Marc Paré + marc at marcpare.com +
+ Thu Oct 14 06:46:31 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
Le 2010-10-14 00:20, Tux99 a écrit :
+>
+>
+> Quote: Fernando Parra wrote on Thu, 14 October 2010 05:59
+>>
+>> Sinner from the Prairy wrote:
+>>>
+>>> We should publicize more Backports.
+>>>
+>>
+>> And I shall reply over and over again, backports isn't a
+>> solution, maybe it's a technical solution, but it isn't
+>> The Solution.
+>>
+>> The end users need to do less than now for to get new versions
+>> of their favourites applications.
+>>
+>> Mageia needs to offer more than other distros, much more, in a
+>> different way. If we aren't to be able to make a completely new
+>> concept, we are in a serious risk to become in other distro at
+>> that sea called GNU / Linux.
+>> --
+>> Fernando Parra<gato2707 at yahoo.com.mx>
+>
+> I agree with what Fernando says, if we could agree on a release cycle that
+> is half way between the fixed release cycle of Mandriva/Ubuntu/Fedora/Suse
+> and the rolling release cycle of PClinuxOS/Gentoo, then Mageia would
+> attract a lot of interest in the Linux world do to it offering something
+> new and compelling rather than the same as everyone else.
+>
+> The results of the poll on mandrivauser.de seem to indicate a strong wish
+> in this direction too, almost half of the voters voted for an annual
+> release cycle with a partial rolling release cycle, i.e. exactly what was
+> suggested in this thread earlier, a stable core updated once a year (apart
+> from security and bug fixes) with new app versions made available during
+> the whole year.
+>
+> http://www.mandrivauser.de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=188&t=29694
+>
+
+Thanks for posting the site Tux99. There was talk of more user groups 
+doing the poll/survey. Does anyone know if this is being done? Great 
+data for the devs to consider.
+
+Marc
+
+
+ + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1