From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101012/001113.html | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101012/001113.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101012/001113.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101012/001113.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101012/001113.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..307c0190c --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101012/001113.html @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Mageia repository sections, licenses, restrictions, firmware etc + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Mageia repository sections, licenses, restrictions, firmware etc

+ Anssi Hannula + anssi.hannula at iki.fi +
+ Tue Oct 12 22:36:47 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 13:31:21 Marc Paré wrote:
+> There was actually nothing wrong with the Mandriva treatment of repos.
+> It clearly satisfied everyone's expectation of their installation. It
+> became a matter of user choice. By installing, by default, non-licensed
+> software you are not giving the user the choice. You are then targeting
+> a group of users who can install without legal consequence.
+
+Didn't you read the first post? :)
+Mandriva in fact includes lots of codec packages covered by patents.
+
+The point is that we need to decide what kind of packages do we want. Should 
+we drop practically all codecs (like Fedora), or have them all in the 
+repository (like Ubuntu)?
+
+
+> I thought that PLF were on board with the Mageia project. Does anyone know?
+
+They are.
+
+-- 
+Anssi Hannula
+
+ + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1