From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/001004.html | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/001004.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/001004.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/001004.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/001004.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0c8ee24bd --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/001004.html @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?

+ Michael Scherer + misc at zarb.org +
+ Thu Oct 7 17:00:35 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
Le jeudi 07 octobre 2010 à 10:22 -0400, Greg Harris a écrit :
+
+> You hit the point precisely. Mandriva's backports was a terrific idea 
+> that does not succeed because (1) it is disabled by default and the 
+> means to enable it as an update medium are made obscure by intention and 
+> design and (2) the strange attitude taken, by some maintainers at least, 
+> that anyone using backports is on their own ("Backports are not 
+> supported!").
+
+Well, when the backport was made without asking to developers first ( as
+it happened with gwibber back at mandriva ), yes, the only thing I can
+say is "I do not support it, because I didn't do it, nor was able to
+test it correctly'.
+
+If we tell "we do not have the ressources to fully test a backport, so
+let's not do it", people are unhappy.
+If we say "ok, here it is, but we didn't test, you are on your own",
+people are unhappy. 
+
+As said by sinnerBOFH, if people want better backports, this requires
+more ressources, there is no magic.
+
+-- 
+Michael Scherer
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1