From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000998.html | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000998.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000998.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000998.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000998.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e64b8f6b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000998.html @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?

+ Tux99 + tux99-mga at uridium.org +
+ Thu Oct 7 16:17:26 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Sinner from the Prairy wrote:
+
+> Besides absolute lack of knowledge about backports, I still have failed to 
+> read an answer how backports are not filling the needs for  bleeding-edge 
+> users.
+
+It's the focus that changes, currently with Mandriva backports are a 
+barely known unsupported afterthought.
+With a light rolling release scheme backports would be supported with 
+regards to security fixes, since backports would be the preferred way to 
+provide security fixes.
+It actually reduces workload since instead of the Mageia devs having to 
+create themselves security patches for older releases, we just use the 
+newer version of the sw from upstream that already includes the security 
+patches.
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1