From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000988.html | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000988.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000988.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000988.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000988.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..93c707e16 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000988.html @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Talk of Browsers + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Talk of Browsers

+ Arnaud Patard (Rtp) + arnaud.patard at rtp-net.org +
+ Thu Oct 7 14:06:27 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
Marc Paré <marc at marcpare.com> writes:
+
+Hi,
+
+>> I saw that suggestion from somebody (in a post to this or the
+>> mageia-discuss list). Mandriva officially supports both KDE and Gnome,
+>> to my understanding.
+>> Since I came to Mandriva from RedHat, I'm more used to Gnome.
+>> I've tried KDE; it take a lot more space, and Gnome suits me better.
+>> So evidently, I'd like Mageia to support both.
+>>
+>> - André (andre999)
+>>
+>>
+>
+> But we still haven't heard from someone on the core Mageia group? Or
+> is this issue still unsettled? Is there anyone from the core group who
+> could jump in and straighten us out?
+
+imho, I don't see any reason why one DE should be prefered to one an
+other. There will be people working on GNOME or KDE or whatever. Mageia
+is handled by a community so this give the possibility to have versions
+with KDE or GNOME installed (or something else). We have choices so why
+should it be reduced to no choice at all ?
+
+As regards having it as default/"prefered" choice, it's something else...
+
+
+Arnaud
+
+ + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1