From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000980.html | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000980.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000980.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000980.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000980.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..656ebc38d --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000980.html @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Talk of Browsers + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Talk of Browsers

+ Oliver Burger + oliver.bgr at googlemail.com +
+ Thu Oct 7 13:27:39 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
Marc Paré <marc at marcpare.com> schrieb am 2010-10-07
+> > Since I came to Mandriva from RedHat, I'm more used to Gnome.
+> > I've tried KDE; it take a lot more space, and Gnome suits me better.
+> > So evidently, I'd like Mageia to support both.
+> But we still haven't heard from someone on the core Mageia group? Or is
+> this issue still unsettled? Is there anyone from the core group who
+> could jump in and straighten us out?
+
+I think, it's quite simple. If there are packagers wanting to do KDE, GNOME, 
+XFCE or LXDE: fine.
+
+If not: not so fine.
+
+You don't believe that a packager using GNOME will build KDE just because some 
+users have the opinion GNOME shell be dropped?
+Before that happens this packager will leave to another distro where he can 
+package GNOME.
+
+So what is the sense of this descussion?
+Remember: this is a community project. you can't force a packager to do, what 
+he choses not to.
+
+Oliver
+
+ + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1