From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000943.html | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 122 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000943.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000943.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000943.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000943.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..327b70065 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101007/000943.html @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?

+ Tux99 + tux99-mga at uridium.org +
+ Thu Oct 7 04:24:56 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, [UTF-8] andré wrote:
+>
+> >Tux99 a écrit :
+> >
+> > That's not what i meant, I meant this:
+> >
+> > This is how mandriva currently does it:
+> > release/foobar-1.1-1mga2010.1
+> > updates/foobar-1.1-2mga2010.1
+> > backports/foobar-1.2-1mga2010.1
+> >
+> > This is how it would be:
+> > release/foobar-1.1-1mga2010.1
+> > updates/foobar-1.2-1mga2010.1
+> >
+> > Basically you drop the backported patch in updates (like I said
+> > earlier, this would only be for apps that don't have child dependencies
+> > and where the new release is not a major new release, just an
+> > incremental release, or at least where it's an evolution not a major
+> > rewrite).
+> >    
+> So you are saying that the same package, with exactly the same name, is 
+> put into updates and backports. 
+
+I didn't say anything like that. Looker closer at my post.
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1