[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?

Thu Oct 7 01:57:42 CEST 2010

2010/10/6 Olivier Thauvin <nanardon at nanardon.zarb.org>
+
+> * Buchan Milne (bgmilne at multilinks.com) wrote:
+> > On Tuesday, 5 October 2010 23:39:09 Tux99 wrote:
+> > > On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, nicolas vigier wrote:
+> >
+> > > 3) I mentioned earlier that the packager would need to use good
+> > > judgement and not include major incompatible version changes
+> >
+> > You are aware that this is significantly more work than 'mdvsys submit -t
+> > 2010.1 --define section=main/backports $package' (after some minimal
+> testing of
+> > course)?
+>
+> This part of the discuss let me think something.
+>
+> We have both some people wanting huge set of backport and other wanting
+> long life release w/o change except security/bug fix.
+>
+> So, why not alternate both, 1 release with backports denied but long
+> life, and the 2nd with backports and update but during a shorter period.
+> (X.0 would be the new distro with backports, X.1 the one more servers
+> oriented or enterprise).
+>
+> What do you think ?
+>
+>
+i am not pro this, i think this is better to have the same policy for all
+the releases.
+-------------- next part --------------
+An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
+URL: </pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20101007/138c9beb/attachment.html>
+