From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000917.html | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000917.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000917.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000917.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000917.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..93e0ce1a6 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000917.html @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] A new office suite ? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] A new office suite ?

+ Florian Hubold + doktor5000 at arcor.de +
+ Wed Oct 6 21:48:14 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
  Am 29.09.2010 21:12, schrieb Ahmad Samir:
+> On 29 September 2010 21:57, Michael Scherer<misc at zarb.org>  wrote:
+>>> On Thursday 30 Sep 2010 05:42:48 André Salaün wrote:
+>>>> OpenOffice or LibreOffice for Mageia ?
+>>>
+>> we can have both packages :)
+>>
+>> --
+>> Michael Scherer
+>>
+> Nooo! unless you want the guy maintaining the go-oo/libreoffice
+> packages to commit suicide :)
+>
+> (Imagine having two bears running loose :)).
+@misc:
+If you have ever tried to rebuild/package the whole OOo, then you wouldn't
+put that out so lightly. Ahmad really has a point there. Full OOo takes up to 24
+hours building time and space requirements are in the region of 20-35 GB IIRC
+on a desktop machine.
+
+So definitely every OfficeSuite should have at least a small team of maintainers,
+at least thats my opinion, from having helped Ghiuseppe Ghibo ironing out
+some packaging/compiling quirks, that was back with OOo 2.2/3/4.
+I think it didn't get much slimmer since then.
+
+BTW, i'm all for LibreOffice!
+
+Regards
+
+Florian Hubold
+
+ + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1