From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000894.html | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000894.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000894.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000894.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000894.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7ad01da48 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000894.html @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?

+ Tux99 + tux99-mga at uridium.org +
+ Wed Oct 6 16:55:48 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
+
+Well, I don't think we will ever come to an agreement especially as it
+seems that former mdv devs here seem to be very reluctant to change
+anything about the release cycle.
+
+Personally as a future Mageia packager I will try to concentrate on making
+backports (apart from maintaining some specific packages) so in a way I
+will be helping to make Mageia in practice a sort of 'light' rolling
+distro as suggested by a few people in this thread.
+
+But I just want to say that based on my experience spending time since many
+years on several Linux forums (not specifically Mandriva ones), I can say
+for sure that the majority of 'normal' (non-geeks) users FEAR AND EVEN
+HATE distro upgrades, they just want to be able to install new versions of
+apps, not risky complete distro upgrades.
+
+So a one year release cycle with lots of app backports (and maybe a kernel
+backport mid-cycle if there is important new hardware support) is IMHO the
+best release cycle for 'normal' users.
+
+
+ + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1