From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000857.html | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000857.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000857.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000857.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000857.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b575ffe22 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000857.html @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?

+ Tux99 + tux99-mga at uridium.org +
+ Tue Oct 5 18:54:03 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
+
+Quote: Ahmad Samir wrote on Tue, 05 October 2010 17:41
+>
+> A rolling distro isn't a defined term, as Michael explained, now you
+> add "light" to the equation and it becomes even more undefined.
+
+You shouldn't look at the name but rather at the description that me and
+others have given here earlier.
+
+> I said all I got to say on this topic, now I can wait and see how
+> things turn out (my guess would be it'll stay the same, Cauldron a
+> rolling/dev distro, and stable releases on predefined intervals, just
+> my "personal" guess).
+
+I guess that depends mostly on what the packagers will feel like doing,
+ultimately in a community distro nobody can be force anyone to do
+anything, if too few people are doing security fix backports but most are
+doing version backports then we will have this 'light' rolling distro (or
+whatever you want to call it), if not then we will have the old mdv
+model.
+
+
+ + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1