From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000851.html | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000851.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000851.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000851.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000851.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3df839012 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000851.html @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?

+ Tux99 + tux99-mga at uridium.org +
+ Tue Oct 5 17:36:57 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
+
+Quote: Ahmad Samir wrote on Tue, 05 October 2010 16:27
+> And nothing breaks? no critical apps get broken in that model?
+> 
+> Personally I haven't use PCLinuxOS before, so can't tell for sure; my
+> guess would be yes, stuff break because new versions are prone to
+> introduce regressions. Note that this happens in cooker, which is
+> indeed a rolling distro.
+
+Sure there can be breakages, but i have also experienced breakages (even
+huges one like 2009.0 with kd4 updats completely uninstalling kde3 even
+though kde 3 was still supported in 2009.0) with the mandriva model of
+backported security fixes.
+
+Saying that the current mdv model is safer than a 'light' rolling model as
+suggested in the previous posts is your personal opinion, not a fact.
+
+
+ + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1