From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000620.html | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000620.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000620.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000620.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000620.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..bdd55d688 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000620.html @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Talk of Browsers + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Talk of Browsers

+ sorteal + sorteal at gmail.com +
+ Fri Oct 1 19:39:29 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
  On 10/1/2010 1:20 PM, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
+> On 1 October 2010 18:54,<sorteal at gmail.com>  wrote:
+>> I must agree. If FF is going to be the default then addons should be done
+>> by the user.  Although I still think a browser better suited to KDE would
+>> be a better choice.
+> That's alreay what we do for years.
+> We install a matching browser according to the choosen desktop.
+> When the user choose KDE we default to konqueror else we default to firefox
+> through meta-task =>  task-kde4 =>  konqueror
+>
+Wasn't saying that anyone didn't do that.  Just throwing my opinion in 
+the ring about addons being installed before hand.  Mandriva has always 
+done an amazing job with implementing FF in KDE!  Yet, other Linux 
+distributions either have a tough time with it or just simply put no 
+effort into adjusting FF to work better with KDE.  Also, as this is not 
+Mandriva I didn't want to make any preconceived notions about features 
+or applications.  Again, Mandriva has always done excellent with its 
+browser implementation and I have no doubt Mageia will follow suit.
+
+ + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1