[Mageia-bugsquad] Update candidates waiting for packager input

Mon Sep 12 10:04:49 CEST 2011

Le samedi 10 septembre 2011 à 01:01 +0200, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
+> Le samedi 10 septembre 2011 00:57:27, Manuel Hiebel a écrit :
+> > Le samedi 10 septembre 2011 à 00:33 +0200, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
+> > > In order to differentiate update candidates awaiting testing and those
+> > > awaiting packager action, we will now assign the bug reports to the
+> > > packagers when we are waiting for their input.
+> > > 
+> > > When doing this, we need to add qa-bugs in CC to the bug report to make
+> > > sure we will still get notifications about it, and that above all it
+> > > still shows in the saved search :
+> > > https://bugs.mageia.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=
+> > > waiting%20for%20QA%20test&sharer_id=22
+> > > 
+> > > This way the state of an update candidate can be identified from the
+> > > information in the bug report:
+> > > - assigned to qa-bugs and has the validated keyword => ready to push
+> > > - assigned to qa-bugs without the validated keyword => update candidate
+> > > that needs testing
+> > > - not assigned to qa-bugs but has qa-bugs in CC => update candidate
+> > > awaiting packager input
+> > > 
+> > > In the above saved search, sorting by Assignee will allow to separate
+> > > updates needing testing and updates awaiting packager input. Maybe in
+> > > the future we can split it in 2 different saved searches if we find it
+> > > useful.
+> > > 
+> > > I see 2 options :
+> > > - either systematically assign to the packager when a tester encounters a
+> > > difficulty or needs more information
+> > > - or only when we have been waiting for more than 2 days
+> > > 
+> > > The first option could be more heavy but the second requires people from
+> > > QA and/or triage to regularly update the bug reports. As we already do
+> > > it, I would choose option 2.
+> > > 
+> > > Which option do you prefer ?
+> > 
+> > option 2 for me
+> > 
+> > > Once we have decided I will try to remember to send this piece of
+> > > information to the mageia-dev mailing and to update the wiki. If I
+> > > forget, please remind it to me :)
+> > 
+> > mageia-discuss is not mageia-dev :p
+> > 
+> 
+> I really meant mageia-dev, to pass the information to packagers, so that they 
+> know that they must assign the bug back to qa-bugs after they did their work 
+> :)
+> 
+> Samuel
+Hi,
+
+I have begin yesterday: http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=triage:report
+I will finish this afternoon 
+-- 
+Manuel Hiebel
+http://www.afa-france.com/netiquette.html
+
+